Pete Rose Deserves to be in the Hall of Fame

To this day, one of the greatest hitters of all time, Peter Edward Rose, is yet to be immortalized in the National Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York. As a player, he was extraordinary. He played in 17 All Star games, and won three World Series. He won two Gold Glove awards, and a few MVPs. He is the all-time leader in hits, 4,286, at-bats, 14,053, and games played, 3,562. He created the head first slide to a bag, and never actually walked when he was walked; his constant speed and determination garnished his nickname, Charlie Hustle. A player of his caliber can only be left out of the Hall of Fame for one reason and one reason only, lying. Pete Rose had a gambling problem and bet on his own team while managing the Cincinnati Reds. Rose, of course, denied the claims for many years, even stating in an interview with Jim Gray of Sports Illustrated, “I’m not going to admit to something that didn’t happen.” Rose was confident in his language and use of words during the interview, and people believed him. He sounded real. Then came the truth. In his autobiography, Rose admitted to betting on baseball; however, he said he only bet for the Reds to win.

I am an apologetic supporter of this unique Hall of Fame situation. I believe that the Hall of Fame should be the place where one is immortalized because of what he did on the field, not what he did off of it. I argue for the induction of these men, cheaters or not, because it is a part of baseball history. The way the Hall of Fame voting process has been is wrong and unfair to those who deserve to be inducted. Once a year, baseball writers for across the country arbitrarily vote for whom they think should go into the Hall of Fame. They are allowed ten votes, one for any name on the ballot. Those with seventy five percent of the vote or higher are inducted in. An uneducated baseball mind may think that seems fair, but when one digs deeper into the situation it is evident that it isn’t. A baseball writer’s job is to inform the public about anything happening in the game, and during the steroid era, 1995- 2005, all they did was praise these men for their incredible numbers and the way the put on a show, completely giving a blind eye to what was really going on. Now, these same men who praised these players, players of which have now been caught for cheating, are voting for their acceptance into the Hall of Fame. They are the judge, the jury, and the ultimate reason why the Hall of Fame today is a lackluster view of what it can be. Betting on baseball is illegal, which is the reason Pete Rose was kicked off the ballot in the first place. If doing something illegal gets you kicked off the ballot, then shouldn’t every player ever caught taking steroids be taken off the ballot as well. Not in the eyes of the only people that matter, the baseball writers.

With all of the steroid era players now appearing on the Hall of Fame ballot, Pete Rose is still getting no say as to whether he deserves to be inducted in the Hall of Fame with them. He deserves to be in. Yes, he bet on baseball, but only as a manager. He cheated, he lied, but so did Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Rafael Palmeiro, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGuire, and the list goes on and on. Nothing these men did is anything different than what Pete Rose did. Rose’s lapse in judgment tarnished the game’s integrity. It did not improve his chances to be enshrined. Can we say the same for Bonds, Clemens, pete-roseMcGwire, Palmeiro, Sosa and Alex Rodriguez? All are at least suspected of cheating the game, in a different way, a better way, apparently. Each made the right mistake. Allegedly. None has joined Rose on the game’s permanently ineligible list.

Due to a better understanding of the game, players are clean and playing baseball the natural way, a way that Pete Rose played, hard nosed, dirty, rough. The Hall of Fame’s purpose is to honor achievement; it is a museum, a shrine, to the history of baseball, good or bad. Rose had 4,256 hits. No one had more. Rose’s gambling didn’t help him get 4,256 hits. It didn’t mess with the outcome of a game any more than another player’s pill, cream, or needle did. It’s erroneous to suggest that because Rose never was found to have bet against his own team, his gambling was less harmful. Rose was admittedly a selfish player, but his selfishness never hurt his team. Compare that with the profound selfishness displayed by Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

Peter Edward Rose was banned for life from baseball because of allegedly betting on baseball games. Nineteen thirty six Hall of Fame inductee, Ty Cobb, openly admitted to murdering a man, but this did not stop him from entering the Hall of Fame. If not the greatest player, Ty Cobb was easily the fiercest competitor. He was a racist who refused to even look at someone with darker skin. He was malevolent, day in and day out. He would sharpen his cleats before games to make sure everyone knew that if you got in his way you were making a trip to the emergency room before the day was over. Rose, fierce like Cobb, heightened the hatred of him throughout his years playing and after. But, if one is going to compare Pete Rose to Ty Cobb, then treat Pete Rose like Ty Cobb.

The Hall of Fame’s purpose is to preserve baseball history and immortalize those who played the game. One hundred years from now, when fathers are telling their sons about Cooperstown and the history of baseball, will baseball have done the right thing and enshrine this man, to make sure his legacy will live on? If this keeps him from ever seeing his name on a plaque on the wall in Cooperstown, than what is the purpose of the Hall of Fame? There is nothing more for Charlie Hustle than to just wait. He needs to tell his side of the story; he needs to support all that is right with baseball, but most of all he needs to wait. Sadly, waiting is all he has left. He has paid his dues and now he has to sit and watch as one by one, these cheaters get elected in. Pete Rose played with the most hustle and the most intensity of anyone who ha

050412_peteRose_bcol_widecs ever played this game. His passion, his love for winning, and being the best has, up to this day, been in vain. Something needs to be done with the Hall of Fame. Something needs to be

fixed to show the fans, and prove to the writers that all men, morally good or bad, need to be placed in the Hall of Fame because of what they accomplished on the field, not their blunders off of it. Pete Rose is now seventy-one years old, his wait though, seems to be lasting him an eternity.

Works Cited

“Cincinnati Reds.” Bleacher Report. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Mar. 2013.

Daugherty, Paul. “Why Rose Should Be in Hall of Fame and Drug Cheats Should Not.” Pete Rose Deserves a Spot in Cooperstown but Steroid Users Do Not. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Mar. 2013.

Stark, Jayson. “White Sox Go from Cursed To first.” N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Mar. 2013.


Lets Talk Hall of Fame for a Second…

The 2013 Hall of Fame vote came out and as we know, nobody got in. This puzzles most fans of baseball as to why the 7-time CY Young Award winner and the all time home run king didn’t get more than 40% of the BBWAA votes. They now have fourteen years of eligibility left to get into the HOF and as one can assume, they will get in. As will Houston Astro Craig Biggio, and eventually Mike Piazza and Curt Shilling as well. As for players like Jeff Bagwell, Larry Walker, Tim Raines, and Lee Smith, though some deserving, might not get as lucky.

Lets talk about the 2014 Hall of Fame ballot; Greg Maddux, Mike Mussina, Frank Thomas, Tom Glavine, Jeff Kent, and Luis Gonzalez will be on the ballot for the first time and I am pretty sure we can make assumptions as to who will be voted in. Maddux, Mussina, Thomas and Glavine will for sure imgresearn 75% of the vote but as for the second base all time leader in home runs, Jeff Kent, will have to wait a few years. Kent is for sure in the same class as Biggio when it comes to HOF possibilities, but I am sorry to say that Luis Gonzales, a career .283 avg with 2,500 hits, although a great player, just doesn’t cut it.When you take the history of the Hall of Fame you see recurring trends in voting. Two of the best players of all time are not going to “first ballot” Hall of Famers but lets look at all the other incredible players who weren’t first ballot either:

  • Jimmie Foxx, 7 years on the ballot
  • Hank Greenberg, 9
  • Rogers Hornsby, 5
  • Eddie Mathews, 5
  • Harmon Killabrew, 4

Shame on the voters for making Duke Snider and Joe Dimaggio wait that long to get in the hall. But, that is the nature of the

imgres-1beast in this incredibly biased, judge and jury, way of voting that has perpetuated from the crop of BBWAA voters.

Oh, and one more thing. I want us to take a look at Kenny Lofton:

Lofton is one of six players in history to have 100 home runs and 600 stolen bases and four of the other five were first-ballot Hall of Famers (Ty Cobb, imgres-2Lou Brock, Joe Morgan and Rickey Henderson), and Tim Raines, another guy who should be in the Hall, is the other. While Lofton might not be the offensive equal to any of those guys, he was an underrated offensive player and a stellar defensive center fielder.

I’m not saying he’s a Hall of Famer. The case is close and if he never got in, it wouldn’t be an injustice, but it should be considered for more than just this year. The injustice here is that he received just 3.2 percent of the vote and is now off the ballot.

If you’re going to penalize “steroid guys” for inflated numbers, then you can’t penalize those who didn’t post inflated numbers. The voters can’t have it both ways.

But, of course, being judge and jury, the writers have the final say.

Hall of Fame Voting

The job of the Hall of Fame is to tell the story of the history of baseball, the records, players, fans, or the bad: the cheating, the betting, the racism, and the steroids. The crop of players on the ballot this year include notables, some linked to steroids and some who are not, such as Mark McGwire, Larry Walker, Rafael Palmeiro, Craig Biggio, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Mike Piazza, and Sammy Sosa. To be inducted into the Hall of Fame, one must have his name on 75% of the ballots casted. All indications conclude that there will be no inductees into the Hall of Fame for 2013, the first time since 1996 that there will be no one inducted.

In American law you are innocent until proven guilty; In baseball, you are guilty until proven innocent.

The Hall of Fame is a museum and its job is to preserve the history of baseball. It is our job as fans of baseball to interpret each and every player and tell his story of how and why he deserves to be in the Hall. The steroid hunt is the 21st century witch-hunt and the view of the media and the people is when one man has big arms hitting home runs, he must’ve been doing steroids– If he has a bad year after that he must be off of them. Jose Bautista hit 54 home runs in 2010 and the first thing that came into everyone’s mind was “Well, he must be juicing. He must be cheating.” When in fact he changed his swing ever so slightly. Bet you didn’t think Melky Cabrera was going to be caught during the 2012 season, subsequently after he won the All- Star Game MVP award. There is no justice in baseball and what needs to be done is to take this era of players and vote them in accordingly and after all is said and done, move on and clean baseball and rid it of this awful epidemic that has taken over the purest of all sports.

The question here is why? Why are players such as Craig Biggio, Mike Piazza and Larry Walker placed into the category of the steroid Hall of Famers? Why does the greatest home run hitter of all time and arguably the greatest pitcher of all time have no future in this Hall of Fame process? The answer is simply this: Baseball is based on the principle of purity, if you can’t play by the rules there is no mercy and sadly for Piazza, Biggio, and Walker, they are stuck in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Would it be good or bad for baseball to ignore steroids all together and take these stats, tainted or not, and enshrine these men into the Hall of Fame? Should there be an “asterisk” next to the name of anybody suspected of steroid use? The words “linked”, “accused”, “suspected”, are all terms we have heard for so long and the time is finally now to settle this argument once and for all. Have these men been positively identified as steroid users, and thusly, did the steroids improve their statistics. Until one of these players has been proven guilty of these offenses, in my book, they are clear to be voted in and have no restrictions in doing so. On the other hand, players such as Alex Rodriguez, who has come out and said that he had taken steroids and Manny Ramirez, who has been punished for his steroid use are not rightfully valuable of the highest honor in the game of baseball.

Take Pete Rose for example. He holds the record for the most hits of all time, 4256, and sadly he will never be in the hall of fame because he was caught cheating. He knowingly broke the rules of baseball and fixed games for the betterment of himself. The argument that I am making here is that he knowingly broke the rules of baseball; he was KNOWINGLY doing something wrong that changed the outcome of the game. Just because everyone was doing steroids doesn’t make it right and just because Major League Baseball wasn’t doing a damn thing about it doesn’t make it right either. They knew, and they didn’t care. Ratings were up and the popularity of baseball had skyrocketed during the “Steroid Era” and now look what it has done. The purest of all games and the purest of all the Hall of Fames is at a crossroad and who is it up to now to fix. What does the Hall of Fame mean if the all-time home run king and a 7-time CY Young award winner do not get elected in? You tell me.